|
Placemaking

Man
with Centaur, metal statuette, possibly early 8th century BC.
With
dawn breaking over the Mall in Washington, four eight-person teams
began carefully unfolding twenty-four square-foot quilts, each
containing thirty-two panels. One person after another stepped up to
the microphone, each reading a list of thirty-two names. When the
1987 ceremony was finished, 1,920 memorial panels covered the earth.
Between Washington’s phallic monuments to power and the war dead,
the soft, bright, handmade memorial to gay men dead of AIDS evoked,
for a moment, the impossible enormity of loss.
Being
queer is characterized by such acts of creating place. We build
temporary, provisional and transgressive space in which
homosexuality is possible. Gay and lesbian people have to
continually, self-consciously make space in which to exist. Queer
space is no sooner built than it disappears: folded up and put away;
ghettoized; annihilated by violence; absorbed by the vast and
overwhelming silence of heteronormative thinking. Being queer is
thus continually engaged in this act or attitude of building a place for the self and the beloved community. In the
design and construction of place, certain patterns persist as ways
we tend to shape the world.
The
Names Project Quilt in Washington, DC, 1987

Celebrating
the 25th Anniversary of the Rainbow Flag by stretching a
gigantic flag from sea to sea, Key West, Florida, 2003
Carnival
is one such pattern. We create carnival most obviously in marvelous
festivities of gay pride, pride marches, the Gay Mardi Gras, the Gay
Games. On Halloween, the quintessential gay holiday, we impersonate
spirits and devils, satirize gender roles, mock soldiers, police,
cowboys, babies, and ourselves. Judy Grahn calls Halloween “the
Night of Nights for the Gay Community.”[i]
Some aspect of carnival is retained in every queer space.
Carnival
is exuberant celebration that incorporates both nightmare images and
riotous laughter. Subconscious fears, madness, fantasies, hilarity
and freakishness all take their space at the carnival. The authors
of A Pattern Language
describe carnival as
“the social, outward equivalent of dreaming.” They write,
“Just as an individual person dreams fantastic happenings to
release the inner forces which cannot be encompassed by ordinary
events, so too a city needs its dreams.”[ii]
Queers have created carnivalesque space in which cities can dream – in steamy bathhouses, dark catacombs, and
bright-lit homes that ring with music and laughter. Instead of
dwelling in the suffocating blandness of heterosexist conformity, we
build space where people can don masks and discard them. Women on
stilts, men with beards and skirts, dykes on bikes, bears, clowns,
slaves – all are brought into the mesh. Carnival honors the
phantasmagoria of the subconscious. When we incorporate the
carnival’s magic into the culture we create and the spaces we
build, we proceed from our inmost images to our strongest
connections out.
Another
persistent pattern we use in the construction of gay space can be
described as claiming the
commons. Seemingly alone among the inhabitants of the modern
metropolis, gays and lesbians inhabit public space. To be queer is
to enter the social and political arena, stake a claim on the
commons, and redefine the commonweal. Whether lobbying
parliamentarians, presenting gay issues to the local school board,
shopping at the community bookstore, or participating in street
festivals celebrating gay pride, being queer involves entering and
creating public space. For people who are not queer, public space
might be nothing more than a journey from one private space to
another. Streets appear soulless and clogged with cars. Homosexuals
find it is both dangerous and exhilarating to appear in public. It
takes great courage to walk down the street being an effeminate man
or a butch woman. Walking arm and arm with our lover, wearing a
rainbow flag, or otherwise claiming queer identity in public, we
engender debate and perhaps violence. We provoke a scrutiny of
social and legal limits. We claim space and create a commons – shared, contested, open space –
as a condition of our lives.
Roman
tetrarchs embracing, statue in Piazza di San Marco, Venice
The
possibility of community
resounds in queer neighborhoods. All over North America and Europe,
lesbians and gays have settled in abandoned urban spaces and
created, with painstaking effort, lively “villages” known for
their intense street life. We have colonized rural areas and
developed community institutions and services in the far North,
East, South and West. People who are not queer may find community is
a concept drained of credibility. Value and meaning are stuck in the
private sphere, which public life leaves unexpressed. People feel
unknown and unrecognized. Their personal choices, passions and
heartaches stay mute and unintelligible in the forms of social and
political interactions that modern life allows. As gays and
lesbians, we find our inmost private being – our sexuality, our individuality, our essence
– at
the core of our call to community.
Building
a place for being queer means that we value everyday
sacredness. Ordinary acts create space for friendships. Cooking,
cleaning, decorating, gardening and homemaking are examples of
placemaking work that is commonly devalued. Other people may care
only for money and status within institutions, but in this public
world, lesbian and gay people are always endangered. Our homes are
homophile spaces –
sanctuaries that nourish and sustain us. Creating retreats from
danger, and habitats where gaiety can flourish, means valuing
everyday sacredness. Simple acts of grace and kindness, a gentle
voice, a carefully-made garment, a vase of flowers, a comfortable
meal – all build space and place where being queer is possible.
As
gay and lesbian people build space in which to live, we consistently
incorporate a place for the dead. “No people who turn their backs on death
can be alive,”[iii]
write the authors of A Pattern
Language. “The presence of the dead among the living will be a
daily fact in any society which encourages its people to live.”
Angels fly through the opening ceremonies of the Gay Games. ACT-UP
confronts the Food and Drug Administration with a die-in. The
Names Project Quilt is a radical reclamation of art for human
and social purposes. It comforts our spirits; it admits the enormity
of our inconsolable grief. When Barbara Deming died of cancer, she
left not only her writing but also a fund called “Money for
Women,” which assists
women in their creative projects. Cancer
in Two Voices[iv]
is the compelling document of a lesbian couple coming to terms with
death. Though we are a people virtually without a history, deprived
of human ancestors, we already have graveyards full of guardian
spirits. In a society that would turn its back on death, we
remember. We mourn. We accept the presence of the dead inside our
call to life, to love, and to community.

Augustan
funerary relief of two women, hands clasped in the gesture typical
of Roman married couples, 27 BC – 14 CE
Pride
is a basic pattern lesbian and gay people use to create space in
which to detoxify from heterosexist culture. We celebrate gay pride
at rallies, dances, festivals, and by making “wild, mad,
revolutionary love” (Jim Fouratt).[v] Bumper
stickers, buttons and T-Shirts proclaim our pride. Pride means
self-respect and more. It means we can delight in what is peculiarly
queer about us. We learn to esteem the rich and complex calling that
homosexuality can signify. We find joy in each other, and we find
ourselves in this joy –
the beauty, strength, giddy laughter, and searing prophesy I am glad
of in you is also a sign of my self. We find a sense of continuity
and soulfulness in the history and mythology of same-sex passion.
Through pride we choose autonomy instead of shame and doubt. We
prefer intimacy to isolation. We live with integrity, instead of
despair. Pride also means arrogance and self-seeking. Pride can be
an antonym to the humility we need to live carefully in community.
But gay pride is not pride in oneself. Our pride cannot exist
without finding and claiming our community. This, if nothing else,
might keep us humble.
We
build with pride between
and alongside invisibility.
Being gay involves continual acts of disclosure punctuated by spaces
in which we disappear. Yet acceptance, identification and sameness
offer their own pleasures and politics. Elsie Jay cautions that we
lose “a whole array of invisible activities and the politics of
commonality”[vi]
by an exclusive focus on visibility. Gay pride is built in public
space. Rally, ghetto and commercial strip are valorized by a focus
on difference. Equally important are the micropolitics of sameness,
through which we build home and neighbourhood outside identifiably
queer space. When other alliances and identifications claim us,
queer identity is slippery and cunning. Behind motherhood, class,
color, shared neighbourhood, or shared environmental concerns, being
queer can metamorphose into a friendly ghost. Instead of
disappearing utterly, or blocking the truth of our commonality,
homosexuality forms a transparency that we see through, and are seen
through, and that sees us through identification, invisibility and
sameness.
Even
in enemy territory, we can create queer zones in the space
between us. At the railway station, grocery store, PTA meeting,
or doctor’s office, space is encircled, embraced, and marked off
as a distinct region when we recognize one another. Finding
strangers with whom to have sex is a dramatic use of this cognitive
process. Aaron Betsky writes, “At its most basic, cruising is an
activity not unlike that of an aboriginal walkabout, in which the
world becomes a score or script that one must bring alive by walking
in it.”[vii]
Cruising is only a succinct expression of a function and office
every homosexual engages. Whether or not we open our lives to the
possibility of sex with strangers, we still bring the world alive by
walking in it. In a world of ordinary people, objects and spaces, a
lesbian or gay person can find openings and alleyways that lead to
both thrill and danger. Recognition and invitation bring the world
to life. Instead of experiencing superficial interactions with a
world of dead issues and fixed meanings, we find astonishment. In
the space between us, gender has no more regulatory function. Wildness
can flourish. There is a place for deep roots, silence and clarity.
The space between us is
where we find queer identity, and the whole web of mythological
associations, cultural expectations, and social possibilities that
come with it. Across the earth, in the space between us, the world
is wakened from its slumber. Provisional, ephemeral queer zones
crackle with electricity. Here, everything is possible. Mobility,
fluidity and surprise characterize queer space. We are a people who
cannot exist apart from one another. In the recognition by which we
call each other into being, we conjure the hope and heart of a
living world.
We are building,
brick by brick, a world to contain us. The space we make is alive
with carnival. We create community from our inmost hearts.
We construct a commons
in every public space. We value everyday
sacredness and incorporate a
place for the dead. We shape the places we inhabit with both pride and invisibility.
We enter queer potentialities in the space
between us. The authors of A
Pattern Language describe a view of building that has great
resonance for lesbian and gay people. They write, “when you build
a thing you cannot merely build that thing in isolation, but must
also repair the world around it, and within it, so that the larger
world at that one place becomes more coherent, and more whole.”[viii]
Individually and together, we build space to be all of who we are.
Everywhere, the world resists us. Yet each small act of building a
place for self and community helps to create larger, global
patterns. Slowly and surely, piece by piece, we make a world that
has these patterns in it. ▼
[i]
Judy Grahn, 1984, (83).
[ii]
Christopher Alexander et. al., 1977, (299).
[iii]
Christopher Alexander et. al., 1977, (353).
[iv]
Sandra Butler and Barbara Rosenblum, 1996, Spinsters Ink.
[vi]
Elsie Jay, “Domestic Dykes: The Politics of
‘In-difference,” in Gordon Brent Ingram et. al, eds, (165).
[vii]
Aaron Betsky, 1997, (193).
[viii]
Christopher Alexander et. al., op. cit. (xiii).
|